PEPC judgment shows that Justice is lying prostrate while technicality stood triumphant- Chief Goddy Uwazurike

.Says Election judgment based on technicality is naked injustice

Reaction on the PEPC judgment  Chief Goddy Uwazurike has expressed that the judgment today showed that Justice is lying prostrate while technicality stood triumphant over it. Indeed, the PEPT relied on a technicality in analysing the trial including the evidence of the witnesses.

To be blunt, the Tribunal failed to realize that it (the judiciary) was on trial in the court of the people. The people expected that the verification of the scores would be a primary duty of the Tribunal.

People expected that the Tribunal would order the “Independent” INEC will be truly independent. INEC bluntly refused to produce the documents used in the election and the Tribunal did nothing. This amounted to an unfair trial because the defense decided the evidence that would be available, notwithstanding the Notice to Produce served on it and the reassurance of the chair that it would comply.

In the end, the Tribunal ruled that the petitioner failed to prove his case. This Tribunal failed to respond to the question, WHO WON?

Those who benefit from injustice see nothing wrong in the system. World over, the judiciary does not rely on technicality. It relies on substantial justice, on what the people understand.

Those who were beaten up during the election, those who were denied the right to vote, and those who witnessed the mutilation of results are still wondering. what happened??

Election judgment based on technicality is naked injustice.